Add auto deps version update workflow #2707
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@vankichi has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 40 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the GitHub Actions workflow in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
vankichi
requested review from
a team,
kpango and
datelier
and removed request for
a team
Deploying vald with
|
| Latest commit: |
f00d518
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://d84b31fd.vald.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://ci-makefile-github-add-auto.vald.pages.dev |
|
[CHATOPS:HELP] ChatOps commands.
|
vankichi
added
actions/backport/release/v1.7
and removed
size/S
type/ci
area/makefile
labels
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
.github/workflows/update-deps.yaml (3)
22-26: LGTM: Context logging job is well-structured.The
dump-contexts-to-logjob is correctly set up and uses the latest version ofactions/checkout, which is good practice. The custom action for dumping context can be valuable for debugging.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the
dump-contexts-to-logjob and what kind of information it logs. This would improve the workflow's self-documentation.
27-40: LGTM: Job setup and Git configuration are well-implemented.The
update-versionjob is correctly configured with appropriate Git and GPG settings. Using a custom token and signing commits with GPG are good security practices.Consider using GitHub's built-in
${{ github.workspace }}context variable instead of${GITHUB_WORKSPACE}in the Git config command for consistency and to ensure it's always correctly expanded:git config --global --add safe.directory "${{ github.workspace }}"🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
34-34: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:42: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
53-64: LGTM: PR creation is well-configured.The PR creation step is correctly implemented and includes all necessary details. Using a conditional check and a separate token for PR creation are good practices.
Consider adding more details to the PR body, such as a list of updated dependencies or a link to the workflow run. This can be achieved by using the
diff_outputsuggested in the previous comment:body: | Automated pull request to update Dependencies. ### Changes: ```diff ${{ steps.check_diff.outputs.diff_output }}[Workflow run](https://github.com/${{ github.repository }}/actions/runs/${{ github.run_id }})
This will provide more context in the PR, making it easier for reviewers to understand the changes. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>Makefile.d/dependencies.mk (2)</summary><blockquote> `156-160`: **LGTM: New `update/buf` target added correctly** The new target for updating the buf version is implemented consistently with other similar targets in the file. It correctly fetches the latest release version from GitHub and writes it to the appropriate version file. Consider adding error handling to the curl command, similar to other targets in this file. For example: ```diff update/buf: - curl -fsSL https://api.github.com/repos/bufbuild/buf/releases/latest | grep -Po '"tag_name": "\K.*?(?=")' > $(ROOTDIR)/versions/BUF_VERSION + @{ \ + RESULT=$$(curl -fsSL https://api.github.com/repos/bufbuild/buf/releases/latest | grep -Po '"tag_name": "\K.*?(?=")'); \ + if [ -n "$$RESULT" ]; then \ + echo $$RESULT > $(ROOTDIR)/versions/BUF_VERSION; \ + else \ + echo "No version found for buf" >&2; \ + exit 1; \ + fi \ + }This change would make the target more robust and consistent with other targets in the file.
201-205: LGTM: Newupdate/usearchtarget added correctlyThe new target for updating the usearch version is implemented consistently with other similar targets in the file. It correctly fetches the latest release version from GitHub and writes it to the appropriate version file.
Consider adding error handling to the curl command, similar to other targets in this file. For example:
update/usearch: - curl -fsSL https://api.github.com/repos/unum-cloud/usearch/releases/latest | grep -Po '"tag_name": "\K.*?(?=")' | sed 's/v//g' > $(ROOTDIR)/versions/USEARCH_VERSION + @{ \ + RESULT=$$(curl -fsSL https://api.github.com/repos/unum-cloud/usearch/releases/latest | grep -Po '"tag_name": "\K.*?(?=")' | sed 's/v//g'); \ + if [ -n "$$RESULT" ]; then \ + echo $$RESULT > $(ROOTDIR)/versions/USEARCH_VERSION; \ + else \ + echo "No version found for usearch" >&2; \ + exit 1; \ + fi \ + }This change would make the target more robust and consistent with other targets in the file.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/update-deps.yaml (1 hunks)
- Makefile.d/dependencies.mk (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/update-deps.yaml
34-34: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:42: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
46-46: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:5:31: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/update-deps.yaml (2)
16-20: LGTM: Workflow name and triggers are well-defined.The workflow name clearly describes its purpose, and the trigger configuration allows for both manual and automated execution. The daily schedule ensures regular dependency checks, which is a good practice for maintaining up-to-date dependencies.
1-64: Overall assessment: Well-implemented workflow with room for minor improvements.This GitHub Actions workflow for updating dependencies is well-structured and achieves its purpose effectively. It includes necessary steps such as checking out the repository, updating dependencies, checking for changes, and creating a pull request when needed. The use of GPG signing and a separate token for PR creation are good security practices.
The suggested improvements throughout the review are mainly focused on:
- Enhancing readability and self-documentation
- Addressing potential shell scripting issues
- Providing more context in the created pull requests
These changes will make the workflow more robust and easier to maintain in the long run. Great job on implementing this automated dependency update process!
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
34-34: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:42: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
46-46: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:5:31: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
Makefile.d/dependencies.mk (2)
20-20: LGTM: New dependencies added correctlyThe
update/bufandupdate/usearchtargets have been appropriately added to theupdate/libstarget. They are placed in alphabetical order, maintaining the existing structure of the file.Also applies to: 42-42
Line range hint
1-305: Overall assessment: Changes are well-implemented and consistentThe additions to the
Makefile.d/dependencies.mkfile effectively introduce support for updating two new dependencies: buf and usearch. The implementation is consistent with existing targets in the file, maintaining the overall structure and purpose of the Makefile.The suggested improvements for error handling in both new targets would further enhance the robustness of the update process, aligning them more closely with some of the more comprehensive targets in the file.
These changes contribute positively to the project's dependency management capabilities.
vankichi
force-pushed
the
ci/makefile-github/add-auto-dependencies-update
branch
3 times, most recently
from
95d3fcd
to
aa86724
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
Makefile.d/dependencies.mk (2)
156-160: Consider adding error handling for API failuresThe implementation follows the established pattern and correctly fetches the buf version. However, like other targets, it might benefit from error handling for API failures.
Consider wrapping the command in a bash block with error handling:
-update/buf: - curl -fsSL https://api.github.com/repos/bufbuild/buf/releases/latest | grep -Po '"tag_name": "\K.*?(?=")' > $(ROOTDIR)/versions/BUF_VERSION +update/buf: + @{ \ + RESULT=$$(curl -fsSL https://api.github.com/repos/bufbuild/buf/releases/latest | grep -Po '"tag_name": "\K.*?(?=")'); \ + if [ -n "$$RESULT" ]; then \ + echo $$RESULT > $(ROOTDIR)/versions/BUF_VERSION; \ + else \ + echo "Failed to fetch buf version" >&2; \ + exit 1; \ + fi \ + }
201-205: Consider adding error handling for API failuresThe implementation follows the established pattern and correctly fetches the usearch version. However, like other targets, it might benefit from error handling for API failures.
Consider wrapping the command in a bash block with error handling:
-update/usearch: - curl -fsSL https://api.github.com/repos/unum-cloud/usearch/releases/latest | grep -Po '"tag_name": "\K.*?(?=")' | sed 's/v//g' > $(ROOTDIR)/versions/USEARCH_VERSION +update/usearch: + @{ \ + RESULT=$$(curl -fsSL https://api.github.com/repos/unum-cloud/usearch/releases/latest | grep -Po '"tag_name": "\K.*?(?=")' | sed 's/v//g'); \ + if [ -n "$$RESULT" ]; then \ + echo $$RESULT > $(ROOTDIR)/versions/USEARCH_VERSION; \ + else \ + echo "Failed to fetch usearch version" >&2; \ + exit 1; \ + fi \ + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/update-deps.yaml (4 hunks)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- Makefile.d/dependencies.mk (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/update-deps.yaml
67-67: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC1046:error:2:1: Couldn't find 'fi' for this 'if'
(shellcheck)
67-67: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC1073:error:2:1: Couldn't parse this if expression. Fix to allow more checks
(shellcheck)
67-67: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC1047:error:8:1: Expected 'fi' matching previously mentioned 'if'
(shellcheck)
67-67: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC1072:error:8:1: Expected 'fi'. Fix any mentioned problems and try again
(shellcheck)
86-86: property "labels" is not defined in object type {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: {string => string}}
(expression)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/update-deps.yaml (1)
Line range hint
55-63: Previous review comment about shell scripting issues is still applicable.🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
57-57: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:5:31: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
Makefile.d/dependencies.mk (2)
20-20: LGTM: New dependencies properly integratedThe additions of
bufandusearchto the update/libs target are well-organized and maintain the alphabetical ordering of dependencies.Also applies to: 42-42
20-20: Verify integration with update workflowPlease ensure that the version files (BUF_VERSION and USEARCH_VERSION) are properly integrated into the update workflow and that the workflow is configured to handle these new dependencies.
Also applies to: 42-42, 156-160, 201-205
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information by checking the workflow files and Makefile structure more thoroughly.
This will help us understand:
- If the update workflow exists and its configuration
- The complete structure of the dependencies.mk file
- The presence and location of version files
- The overall workflow setup for dependency updates
Let me check the workflow configuration to verify the integration of the new dependencies.
Based on the analysis of the dependencies.mk and update-deps.yaml, I can verify the integration:
Dependencies are properly integrated
The new dependencies (buf and usearch) are correctly integrated into the update workflow through:
- The
update/libstarget in dependencies.mk includes bothupdate/bufandupdate/usearch- The update-deps.yaml workflow runs
make updatewhich executes all update targets including the new ones- The version files (BUF_VERSION and USEARCH_VERSION) are properly managed through their respective update targets
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the version files are referenced in the workflow # and that the workflow is configured to handle these new dependencies echo "Checking for version files usage in workflows..." rg -l "BUF_VERSION|USEARCH_VERSION" .github/workflows/ echo "Checking for update workflow configuration..." rg -l "buf|usearch" .github/workflows/update-deps.yamlLength of output: 321
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if update-deps.yaml exists and examine its content echo "Checking if update-deps.yaml exists..." fd -t f "update-deps.yaml" .github/workflows/ echo "\nChecking all workflow files for update-related tasks..." fd -t f . .github/workflows/ -x cat {} echo "\nExamining Makefile structure for update targets..." cat Makefile.d/dependencies.mk echo "\nChecking for version files..." fd -g "*VERSION*" .Length of output: 231318
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check update-deps.yaml workflow for buf and usearch integration echo "Checking update-deps workflow..." cat .github/workflows/update-deps.yaml echo "\nChecking if version files are referenced in workflow paths..." rg "versions/(BUF|USEARCH)_VERSION" .github/workflows/update-deps.yamlLength of output: 3387
Makefile (1)
508-508: LGTM! Verify the go/example/deps target implementation.The addition of
go/example/depsto the update target is a good improvement to ensure example code dependencies are also updated.Let's verify the target implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the target implementation and its dependencies.
Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response:
Target implementation verified and working as expected
The
go/example/depstarget is properly implemented inMakefile.d/dependencies.mkand:
- Correctly manages dependencies for Go example code in
example/client/- Handles cleanup of vendor directories and Go module files
- Updates Go version in the module file
- Runs
go mod tidyin the example client directory- Affects existing Go files:
main.go,agent/main.go, andmirror/main.go🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the go/example/deps target is properly defined # Test: Search for the target definition rg -A 5 '(^|\s)go/example/deps:'Length of output: 401
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the complete implementation of go/example/deps target and related targets rg -A 10 '(^|\s)go/example/deps:' Makefile.d/dependencies.mk # Check if there are any example Go files that would be affected fd -e go . example/ # Check if there's a go.mod file in the example directory fd go.mod example/Length of output: 725
vankichi
force-pushed
the
ci/makefile-github/add-auto-dependencies-update
branch
from
e90a426
to
ee030cd
Compare
Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>
vankichi
force-pushed
the
ci/makefile-github/add-auto-dependencies-update
branch
from
ee030cd
to
b25a165
Compare
Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>
vankichi
force-pushed
the
ci/makefile-github/add-auto-dependencies-update
branch
from
b25a165
to
f00d518
Compare
* 💚 Add auto deps version update workflow Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]> * 💚 Update make commands Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]> * 💚 Fix Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]> * 💚 Add make permission Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]> * 💚 Add labels Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]> * 💚 Fix Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]>
* 💚 Add auto deps version update workflow * 💚 Update make commands * 💚 Fix * 💚 Add make permission * 💚 Add labels * 💚 Fix --------- Signed-off-by: vankichi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Kiichiro YUKAWA <[email protected]>
Description
SSIA
Related Issue
Versions
Checklist
Special notes for your reviewer
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
bufandusearchtools.Chores